COMP 6471 Software Design Methodologies

Fall 2012 Section NN


Final Marks

Note that the marks are scaled to an average of 65.0% and an sd of 13.5%.

This includes quiz marks and total assignment marks.

Marks are
Qz1 - scaled quiz 1 mark /100
Qz2 - scaled quiz 2 mark /100
Qz - total of scaled quiz mark /100
A.raw - raw total of assistment marks /40
A.scaled - scaled assignment marks /100
Total is weighted sum of Qz and A.scaled (60% for assigments, 40% for quizzes)

SID	Qz1	Qz2	Qz	A.raw	A.scaled	Total
6573304	65.63	68.98	67.30	27.00	68.43		67.98
6475515	45.45	35.96	40.71	21.50	47.92		45.03
5894476	85.80	70.81	78.31	33.50	92.67		86.93
6764118	75.72	87.32	81.52	25.50	62.84		70.31
1694839	45.45	54.31	49.88	24.00	57.24		54.30
1942557	81.77	57.97	69.87	26.00	64.70		66.77
6218202	67.64	70.81	69.23	28.00	72.16		70.99
6608590	63.61	72.65	68.13	26.00	64.70		66.07
6201245	81.77	79.99	80.88	30.50	81.48		81.24
6586651	49.48	57.97	53.73	22.00	49.78		51.36
6113753	63.61	67.15	65.38	27.50	70.30		68.33
6388663	59.57	56.14	57.86	21.50	47.92		51.89

Quiz 2 Marks

Note that the marks are scaled to an average of 65.0% and an sd of 13.5%.

SID     Q1/20   Q2/20   Q3/20   raw/60  scaled/100
6573304	7	9	6	22	68.98
6475515	1	1	2	4	35.96
5894476	9	6	8	23	70.81
6764118	10	10	12	32	87.32
1694839	4	6	4	14	54.31
1942557	7	5	4	16	57.97
6218202	6	10	7	23	70.81
6608590	7	8	9	24	72.65
6201245	8	13	7	28	79.99
6586651	3	8	5	16	57.97
6113753	6	9	6	21	67.15
6388663	7	3	5	15	56.14

Quiz 1 Marks

Note that the marks are scaled to an average of 65.0% and an sd of 13.5%.

SID	Q1/20	Q2/20	Q3/20	raw/60	scaled/100
6573304	9	6	4	19	65.63
6475515	2	2	5	9	45.45
5894476	8	8	13	29	85.80
6764118	8	9	7	24	75.72
1694839	2	3	4	9	45.45
1942557	9	10	8	27	81.77
6713017	7	4	5	16	59.57
6218202	7	6	7	20	67.64
6608590	8	6	4	18	63.61
6201245	10	8	9	27	81.77
6586651	1	5	5	11	49.48
6113753	6	5	7	18	63.61
6388663	6	7	3	16	59.57

Assignment Marks

Note that the marks will be scaled to an average of 65.0% and an sd of 13.5% before they are combined with the Quiz marks in order to determine your total mark.

Marks are in the order:
Structure of code (2.5)
Clarity of code(2.5)
Code documentation (2.5)
Document: clear diagrams, explanatory text, completeness and understandability (2.5)

for a total out of 10.

Assignment 3 and 4

SID					A3					A4
6573304	2	2	2	1	7	1	2	2	1	6
6475515	1	1.5	1.5	0.5	4.5	1	1.5	1.5	1	5
5894476	2	2	2	2	8	1.5	1.5	2	2	7
6764118	1	1.5	1.5	1	5	1	1.5	1.5	1	5
1694839	1	2	2	0.5	5.5	1	1	1	0	3
1942557	2	2	2	1	7	2	2	2	1	7
6218202	2	2.5	2	1.5	8	2	2	2	2	8
6608590	2	2	1.5	1	6.5	1	2	2	0.5	5.5
6201245	2	2	2	1.5	7.5	2	2	2	1	7
6586651	1	1.5	1	1	4.5	1	1.5	1	1	4.5
6113753	2	2	2	1	7	2.5	2	2	1	7.5
6388663	1	2	2	1	6	1.5	2	2	2	7.5

Assignment 2

Revised 2012-10-29

6608590	1	2	2	1	6
6586651	1	2	2	1	6
6475515	1	2	2	0	5

Notes
6608590 please re-submit as a tar,gz as I could not read your .rar file
6586651 please re-submit as a tar,gz as I could not read your .rar file
6475515 please re-submit your document as i could not read your .docx file

Comments
Please check the difference between a domain model and a class diagram for a software design.
Many submissions did not have a clear Command class for processing undo/redo.

6573304	1	2	2	1	6
6475515	1	2	2	0	5
5894476	2.5	2.5	2.5	1	8.5
6764118	2	2	2.5	2	8.5
1694839	1	2	2	1	6
1942557	1	2	2	1	6
6713017	2	2	1	1	6
6218202	1	2	2	1	6
6201245	1	2	2	2.5	7.5
6113753	1	2	2	2	7
6388663	1	1	1	1	4

Assignment 1

Revised 2012-10-29

6608590 2       2       2       2       8
6475515 2       2       2       1       7

Notes
6608590 please re-submit as a tar,gz as I could not read your .rar file
6475515 please re-submit your document as i could not read your .docx file

Comments
Many submissions had a code structure that had too few classes, and overly large classes. Try to have one class per domain concept, plus packaging for model, view, control.
For the document, please focus on the major classes. Some people had a brief description of everything, and the document was too long. One aim of this part of the assignment was to practice separating important decisions (ie classes0 from less important decsions about the design.

6573304	2	2	2	2	8
6475515	2	2	2	0	6
5894476	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	10
6764118	1	2	2	2	7
1694839	2.5	2.5	2.5	2	9.5
1942557	1	2	2	1	6
6713017	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	10
6218202	1	2	2	1	6
6201245	2	2	2	2.5	8.5
6586651	1	2	2	2	7
6113753	1	2	2	1	6
6388663	1	1	1	1	4


Last modified on Novemeber 24, 2012 by gregb@cs.concordia.ca