SOEN 6011 Software Engineering Process


Final Examination Marks

Raw mark was scaled to a percentage with average of 65.0 and sd of 13.5 for the class.

SID	F-Q1/20	F-Q2/20	F-Q3/20	F-Q4/20	F-Q5/20	Final-raw%	F-scaled%
4138554	15	7	18	9	14	63	77.52
4744322	5	8	4	5	5	27	50.37
4774647	10	11	2	8	6	37	57.91
5161010	17	15	2	9	6	49	66.96
5763339	7	9	3	5	6	30	52.63
5794927	15	15	9	13	11	63	77.52
5813840	19	16	15	10	11	71	83.55
5871468	8	18	7	10	12	55	71.49
6144985	12	18	10	9	9	58	73.75
6145876	14	17	14	7	8	60	75.26
6163203	9	10	10	5	7	41	60.93
6165303	11	11	8	9	10	49	66.96
6165648	15	10	12	8	13	58	73.75
6169929	11	11	11	13	9	55	71.49
6173705	16	11	13	8	11	59	74.5
6195350	7	5	10	7	9	38	58.66
9019642	11	12	3	5	9	40	60.17
9031669	6	12	12	6	14	50	67.72
9057293	9	11	11	7	13	51	68.47
9060685	11	15	1	13	7	47	65.45
9087281	15	20	15	10	13	73	85.06
9171401	6	11	10	8	4	39	59.42
9182802	8	5	4	8	9	34	55.65
9186387	16	12	13	10	11	62	76.77
9190317	14	16	2	1	12	45	63.94

Practical Marks

SID	Proj1/5	Doc1/5	Proj2/5	Doc2/5	Proj3/5	Doc3/5	P+D/30
4138554	5	4	5	4.7	4.5	4.5	27.7
4744322	3	3	2.2	5	3	4	20.2
4774647	2.2	1.75	0	0	0	0	3.95
5161010	3.9	5	5	4.9	5	4.5	28.3
5745608	4.15	2.5	0	0	0	0	6.65
5763339	2.3	5	1.2	4.9	2.5	4	19.9
5794927	4.9	4	4.8	5	4.2	4.5	27.4
5813840	4.9	4	2	5	4	4.5	24.4
5871468	4.2	2	5	5	4.2	4	24.4
6144985	3.9	1.5	0	5	4.5	4.5	19.4
6145876	0	4	3.8	4.4	4	4	20.2
6163203	3.5	5	5	4.9	3.5	5	26.9
6165303	3	1	0	0	3	4	11
6165648	4	4	4	5	4	5	26
6169929	4	5	5	5	4	5	28
6173705	3.9	5	4.8	4.9	4	5	27.6
6195350	4.25	3.5	4.8	4.9	0	4	21.45
9019642	3	3	4.6	5	4	4	23.6
9031669	3.4	2.5	3.9	5	5	4.8	24.6
9057293	3.1	1.5	3.9	5	5	4.5	23
9060685	2.9	1.5	4.8	5	4	4.5	22.7
9087281	2.9	4.5	5	5	5	5	27.4
9171401	2.5	5	5	5	4.5	4	26
9182802	3.9	1	1.6	0	4.5	4	15
9186387	3.5	3.5	4.5	4.9	4.5	4	24.9
9190139							0
9190317	4	1	5	5	4.5	4.5	24

Midterm Marks

Raw mark was scaled to a percentage with average of 65.0 and sd of 13.5 for the class.

	Q1/15	Q2/15	Q3a/15	Q3b/15	raw/60	scaled%
9031669 8	9	10	9	36	71.85
6145876 5	8	10	9	32	63.55
4774647	6	6	11	10	33	65.62
6163203 11	4	9	9	33	65.62
5871468 13	10	10	12	45	90.55
5763339	9	3	9	7	28	55.24
9190139	1	2	5	8	16	30.32
9182802	9	2	10	10	31	61.47
5794927	11	6	12	9	38	76.01
9186387	13	5	13	11	42	84.32
9060685 5	2	9	10	26	51.08
6169929	8	4	10	13	35	69.78
5185572 5	3	6	9	23	44.85
6165303 8	6	12	9	35	69.78
9087281	11	10	9	12	42	84.32
9190422 6	4	10	10	30	59.39
9190317 6	4	8	9	27	53.16
9057293	7	4	10	10	31	61.47
5161010	9	8	10	9	36	71.85
9180826 5	4	10	10	29	57.32
5741238	8	6	11	10	35	69.78
9009531 4	0	9	7	20	38.62
9171401	2	4	10	13	29	57.32
5745608	11	4	8	9	32	63.55
6173705 11	6	14	9	40	80.16
4744322 7	3	8	10	28	55.24
6144985 11	5	8	8	32	63.55
9019642 6	10	11	11	38	76.01
6165648 10	7	10	10	37	73.93
4138554 6	9	8	11	34	67.7
5813840 11	10	12	10	43	86.39
6195350 5	6	10	10	31	61.47

Project 1 Marks

Program criteria
Functionality/1: Plays game successfully - more than random moves, has adequate useability.
Testing/2: Coverage - many tests being run against multiple units. Significance - tests not entirely trivial, look at boundaries, etc.
Program design/2: O-O structure - use of classes to support separation of concerns, low coupling, and high cohesion. Comments - both sufficient and meaningful. I want to understand what I'm looking at.

Document criteria:
Clarity/1: overall organization and presentation. Does organization makes for clear and understandable document?
Test Coverage/2: describes what parts of the system are to be tested and which not, in terms of system functionality, subsystems and/or units (i.e., higher-level design entities, *not* methods) from the viewpoint of testing. Reasons for testing or not testing, and what is to gained (or lost).
Cases/2: plan should be executable by someone other than the author. Requires details and organization. Should not just be a diary, or listing of JUint code.

        Program Marks                        total      Document Marks       total
4138554	1	1	1	1	1	5	1	2	1	4
4744322	1	0.5	1	0	0.5	3	0.5	1.5	1	3
4774647	1	0.5	0.5	0.2	0.25	2.2	0.5	1.5	0	1.75
5161010	0.9	1	1	1	0	3.9	1	2	2	5
5185572	0.8	0.5	0.5	0.2	0	2	0.5	0.5	0	1
5741238	0.8	0.5	1	0	0	2.3	0.5	0.5	0	1
5745608	0.9	1	1	1	0.25	4.15	0.5	1	1	2.5
5763339	0.8	0.5	1	0	0	2.3	1	2	2	5
5794927	0.9	1	1	1	1	4.9	1	2	1	4
5813840	0.9	1	1	1	1	4.9	1	2	1	4
5871468	0.9	0.5	1	1	0.8	4.2	0.5	0.5	1	2
6144985	0.9	1	1	1	0	3.9	0.5	0.5	0.5	1.5
6145876	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1.5	1.5	4
6163203	0.5	1	1	1	0	3.5	1	2	2	5
6165303	0.5	0.5	1	1	0	3	0.5	0	0.5	1
6165648	1	1	1	1	0	4	1	2	1	4
6169929	1	1	1	1	0	4	1	2	2	5
6173705	0.9	1	1	1	0	3.9	1	2	2	5
6195350	1	1	1	1	0.25	4.25	0.5	2	1	3.5
9019642	1	0.5	1	0.5	0	3	1	1	1	3
9031669	0.9	1	1	0.5	0	3.4	0.5	1	1	2.5
9057293	0.9	0.5	1	0.2	0.5	3.1	0.5	1	0	1.5
9060685	0.9	0.5	1	0.5	0	2.9	0.5	0.5	0.5	1.5
9087281	0.9	0.5	1	0.5	0	2.9	1	1.5	2	4.5
9171401	1	0.5	1	0	0	2.5	1	2	2	5
9180826	0.9	0.5	1	0.5	0	2.9	0.5	0.5	0	1
9182802	0.9	1	1	1	0	3.9	0.5	0	0.5	1
9186387	0.5	1	1	1	0	3.5	0.5	2	1	3.5
9190317	1	1	1	1	0	4	0.5	0.5	0	1
9190422	1	1	1	1	0	4	0.5	1	1	2.5


Last modified on January 7, 2008 by gregb@cs.concordia.ca