|
|||||||
|
Given any positive integer r and positive integers k_1, k_2, ..., k_r, there is an integer m such that given any partition {1,2,...,m}=P_1 U P_2 U ... U P_r, there is always a class P_j containing an arithmetic progression of length k_j. Let us denote the least m with this property by w(r; k_1, k_2, ..., k_r). Van der Waerden numbers known so far: |
|||||||
| w(r; k_1, k_2, ..., k_r) | = | Reference | |||||
| w(2; 3, 3) | = 9 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 4) | = 18 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 5) | = 22 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 6) | = 32 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 7) | = 46 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 8) | = 58 | Beeler and O'Neil [3] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 9) | = 77 | Beeler and O'Neil [3] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 10) | = 97 | Beeler and O'Neil [3] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 11) | = 114 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 12) | = 135 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 13) | = 160 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 14) | = 186 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 15) | = 218 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 16) | = 238 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 17) | = 279 | Ahmed [1a] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 18) | = 312 | Ahmed [1a] | |||||
| w(2; 3, 19) | = 349 | Ahmed, Kullmann and Snevily [1d] | |||||
| w(2; 4, 4) | = 35 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 4, 5) | = 55 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(2; 4, 6) | = 73 | Beeler and O'Neil [3] | |||||
| w(2; 4, 7) | = 109 | Beeler [2] | |||||
| w(2; 4, 8) | = 146 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(2; 4, 9) | = 309 | Ahmed [1b] | |||||
| w(2; 5, 5) | = 178 | Stevens and Shantaram [10] | |||||
| w(2; 5, 6) | = 206 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(2; 5, 7) | = 260 | Ahmed (Dec. 2011) (Double Checking...) | |||||
| w(2; 5, 8) | >= 331 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(2; 5, 9) | >= 473 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(2; 5, 10) | > 557 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(2; 5, 11) | > 736 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(2; 6, 6) | = 1132 | Kouril and Paul [7] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 3) | = 14 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 4) | = 21 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 5) | = 32 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 6) | = 40 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 7) | = 55 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 8) | = 72 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 9) | = 90 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 10) | = 108 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 11) | = 129 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 12) | = 150 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 13) | = 171 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 3, 14) | = 202 | Schweitzer [9] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 4, 4) | = 40 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 4, 5) | = 71 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 4, 6) | = 83 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 4, 7) | = 119 | Kouril [6] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 4, 8) | > 155 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(3; 2, 5, 5) | = 180 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 3) | = 27 | Chvátal [5] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 4) | = 51 | Beeler and O'Neil [3] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 5) | = 80 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 6) | = 107 | Ahmed [1b] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 7) | > 149 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 8) | > 185 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 9) | > 221 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 3, 10) | > 265 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 4, 4) | = 89 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 4, 5) | > 163 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(3; 3, 5, 5) | > 243 | Ahmed [1c] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 3) | = 17 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 4) | = 25 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 5) | = 43 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 6) | = 48 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 7) | = 65 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 8) | = 83 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 9) | = 99 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 10) | = 119 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 3, 11) | = 141 | Schweitzer [9] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 4, 4) | = 53 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 4, 5) | = 75 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 2, 4, 6) | = 93 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 3, 3, 3) | = 40 | Brown [4] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 3, 3, 4) | = 60 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(4; 2, 3, 3, 5) | = 86 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(4; 3, 3, 3, 3) | = 76 | Beeler and O'Neil [3] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 3, 3) | = 20 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 3, 4) | = 29 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 3, 5) | = 44 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 3, 6) | = 56 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 3, 7) | = 72 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 3, 8) | = 88 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 4, 4) | = 54 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 2, 4, 5) | = 79 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 3, 3, 3) | = 41 | Landman, Robertson and Culver [8] | |||||
| w(5; 2, 2, 3, 3, 4) | = 63 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(6; 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3) | = 21 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(6; 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4) | = 33 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(6; 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 5) | = 50 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(6; 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 6) | = 60 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(6; 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, 4) | = 56 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(6; 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3) | = 42 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(7; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3) | = 24 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(7; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4) | = 36 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(7; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 5) | = 55 | Ahmed [1b] | |||||
| w(8; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3) | = 25 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
| w(8; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4) | = 40 | Ahmed [1b] | |||||
| w(9; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3) | = 28 | Ahmed [1] | |||||
|
[1] Ahmed T., Some new van der Waerden numbers and some van der Waerden-type numbers,
INTEGERS: Electronic journal of Combinatorial Number Theory
9
(2009), A06, pp 65-76. [1a] Ahmed T., Two new van der Waerden numbers: w(2; 3, 17) and w(2; 3, 18), INTEGERS: Electronic journal of Combinatorial Number Theory 10 (2010), A32, pp 369-377. [1b] Ahmed T., On computation of exact van der Waerden numbers, INTEGERS: Electronic journal of Combinatorial Number Theory 11 (2011), A71. [1c] Ahmed T., Some new lower bounds of van der Waerden numbers [.pdf] [1d] Tanbir Ahmed, Oliver Kullmann, and Hunter Snevily, On the van der Waerden numbers w(2; 3, t), submitted. (arXiv:1102.5433v1 [math.CO]) [2] Beeler M., A new van der Waerden number, Discrete Applied Math. 6 (1983), 207. [3] Beeler M., O'Neil P., Some new van der Waerden numbers, Discrete Math. 28 (1979), 135-146 [4] Brown T. C., Some new van der Waerden numbers (preliminary report), Notices American Math. Society 21 (1974), A-432. [5] Chvátal V., Some unknown van der Waerden numbers, Combinatorial Structures and Their Applications (R.Guy et al.,eds.), Gordon and Breach, New York, (1970) [6] Kouril M., A Backtracking Framework for Beowulf Clusters with an Extension to Multi-Cluster Computation and Sat Benchmark Problem Implementation, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Engineering : Computer Science and Engineering, 2006. [7] Kouril M., Paul J.L., The Van der Waerden Number W(2,6) is 1132, Experimental Mathematics [8] Landman B., Robertson A., Culver C., Some New Exact van der Waerden Numbers, Integers 5 (2005) 2 [9] Schweitzer P., Problems of Unknown Complexity, Graph isomorphism and Ramsey theoretic numbers, Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.), U. des Saarlandes, 2009. PDF [10] Stevens R., Shantaram R., Computer-generated van der Waerden partitions, Math. Computation 32 (1978), 635-636. Some van der Waerden type numbers. Return to HOMEPAGE. |
|||||||