Conceptual Reference Database for Building Envelope Research Prev
Next

Dustborne and airborne fungal propagules represent a different spectrum of fungi with differing relations to home characteristics

Chew, G. L., Rogers, C., Burge, H. A., Muilenberg, M. L. and Gold, D. R.
2003
Allergy, 58(1): 13

Chew, G. L., Rogers, C., Burge, H. A., Muilenberg, M. L. and Gold, D. R., (2003), "Dustborne and airborne fungal propagules represent a different spectrum of fungi with differing relations to home characteristics", Allergy, 58(1): 13.
Abstract:
Background: Exposure to fungi is often assessed by culturing floor dust or air samples. Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between dustborne and airborne fungi and to identify factors that modify these relationships.

Methods: From November 1994 to September 1996 sequential duplicate 45-l air samples were collected in bedrooms of 496 homes in the Boston area, using a Burkard culture plate sampler. After air sampling, bedroom floors were sampled with a vacuum cleaner that was modified to collect dust in a cellulose extraction thimble. Dust was sieved, and the fine dust was dilution-plated onto DG-18 media.

Results: Concentrations of total culturable fungi per gram of bedroom-floor dust were correlated weakly, but significantly, with those of indoor air (r = 0.13, P < 0.05). Concentrations of some individual taxa in the dust and indoor air were also weakly associated. Adjusting for the concentrations of fungi in outdoor air, dustborne fungal concentrations were positively associated with those in indoor air for the taxa Cladosporium and Penicillium, but not for total fungi. The indoor air fungal levels were often predicted by different covariates to those predicting fungal levels in dust. The type of housing (house or apartment) and the presence of carpeting were often predictive factors for dust fungi. In contrast, outdoor fungal levels were often predictive of the indoor air fungal levels.

Conclusions: Because our data do not indicate a strong overall relationship between culturable fungi in dust and indoor air, the results from these two methods (dust and air sampling) likely represent different types of potential fungal exposures to residents. It may be essential to collect both air and dust samples, as well as information on housing characteristics, as indicators for fungal exposure.
Related Resources:

Related Concepts

Author Information and Other Publications Notes
Chew, G. L.
  1. Fungal extracellular polysaccharides, (13)-glucans and culturable fungi in repeated sampling of house dust  
Rogers, C.
     
Burge, H. A.
  1. An update on pollen and fungal spore aerobiology
  2. Characterization of fungi occurring on "new" gypsum wallboard
  3. Distribution of various fungi reported on different indoor substrates
  4. Fungal growth in buildings: the aerobiological perspective
  5. Health risk assessment of fungi in home environments
  6. Indoor allergens: assessing and controlling adverse health effects
  7. Moisture, organisms, and health effects
  8. Populations and determinants of airborne fungi in large office buildings
  9. Quantification of ergosterol and 3-hydroxy fatty acids in settled house dust by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Comparison with fungal culture and determination of endotoxin by a Limulus amebocyte lysate assay
  10. Review of concentration standards and guidelines for fungi in indoor air  
Muilenberg, M. L.
  1. Sampling devices  
Gold, D. R.
     


CRDBER, at CBS, BCEE, ENCS, Concordia,