Conceptual Reference Database for Building Envelope Research Prev
Next

Mitigation of visible fungal contamination in buildings: experience from 1993 - 1998

Morey, P. R., Cih, D. S.
2001
In "Bioaerosols, Fungi and Mycotoxins: Health Effects, Assessment, Prevention and Control", Edited by Johanning, E., Boyd Printing, Albany, New York
Fungi, Remediation, Colonization, Dust, Stachybotrys chartarum, Aspergillus versicolor


Morey, P. R., Cih, D. S., (2001), "Mitigation of visible fungal contamination in buildings: experience from 1993 - 1998", In "Bioaerosols, Fungi and Mycotoxins: Health Effects, Assessment, Prevention and Control", Edited by Johanning, E., Boyd Printing, Albany, New York.
Abstract:
Experience in the early 1990's led to the recommendation that removal of visible fungal growth from interior surfaces in buildings be performed in a manner that minimized the dispersion of particles (dusts) in indoor air. Several documents beginning with the 1994 New York City Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Stachybotrys atra in Indoor Environments provided practitioners with procedures that can be used to remove visible fungal growth from building interiors. All fungal remediation guidelines recommend that sustained and extensive fungal growth on interior surfaces should be physically removed and that people performing remediation work should use appropriate personal protective equipment. In addition, all guidelines published in 1993-1998 recommend that moisture problems in building infrastructure be fixed in order to prevent new fungal growth. Fungal remediation guidelines specify a certain surface area of visible fungal growth (generally 3 to 10m2) that requires containment barriers similar to those used when hazardous chemical or physical materials are removed from buildings. Misunderstanding of 1993-1998 guidelines has resulted in both overly conservative approaches to clean-up as well as to dispersion of fungal spores throughout a building because of poor dust control. Unlike guidelines on removal of hazardous chemical and physical agents where rigid inspection protocols and specific numerical guidelines are appropriate, the removal of mycobiota is a variable process depending on many factors including the biology of the fungal taxa. Factors such as the following should be considered during the remediation process: (a) the location, extent, and kind of fungal growth in building systems, (b) the susceptibility of building materials to biodeterioration, (c) the porosity of building materials, (d) the susceptibility of occupants to bioaerosol exposure, and (e) sampling and monitoring protocols appropriate for the fungal contaminants. Fungal remediation in buildings continues to require a considerable degree of professional judgement with regard to procedures appropriate for containment of dusts and for control of the contaminant mycobiota.

Related Resources:
  • This link has not been checked.Bioaerosols, Fungi and Mycotoxins, Ed. by Johanning, E.
    "papers presented at the September, 1998 Third International Conference in Saratoga Springs, New York. clinical and epidemiological studies and technical reports on an emerging public health topic affecting people in indoor environments at work and at home."


Related Concepts


Author Information and Other Publications Notes
Morey, P. R.
  1. Air- and dustborne mycoflora in houses free of water damage and fungal growth
  2. Building-associated pulmonary disease from exposure to Stachybotrys chartarum and Aspergillus versicolor
  3. Construction defects and microbial growth
  4. El Ni?o water leaks identify rooms with concealed mould growth and degraded indoor air quality
  5. Hidden mold sometimes enters the indoor air
  6. Microbial VOCs as indicators for mold growth in buildings
  7. Practical aspects of sampling for organic dusts and microorganisms
  8. Use of fungal detectors to monitor drying of water damaged buildings
  9. Water leakage from exterior walls as an indicator of degraded air quality  
Cih, D. S.
     



CRDBER, at CBS, BCEE, ENCS, Concordia,