Conceptual Reference Database for Building Envelope Research Prev
Next

Construction problems in multi-family residential buildings

Drysdale, R.G
1990
Canadian Housing Information Center (CHIC), S¨Śrie technique 90-230


Drysdale, R.G, (1990), Construction problems in multi-family residential buildings, Canadian Housing Information Center (CHIC), S¨Śrie technique 90-230.
Abstract:
Introduction

Many high-rise residential buildings require extensive arid costly repairs while still relatively new (less than 2 years old, in some cases). In 1991, for example, the Ontario New Home Warranty Program (ONHWP) paid out $20 million for repairs to high-rise condominium buildings.

In order to comprehensively document the types, frequencies and causes of problems, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) and ONHWP developed a computer program to identify the main types of problems and correlate them with corresponding building systems or design and construction practices.

Problem data were obtained from ONHWP's files, which contain information on complaints, confirmation, resolution, and in some cases repair costs. Design and construction details were determined from the buildings' original plans, which were borrowed from the contractor, designer or condominium board. In some cases, researchers also visited the building in person to check on certain details and gain an overall impression of construction quality.

Findings

The most common complaints were of moisture problems, reported for 36 out of 44 buildings. Moisture problems were found to correlate with poor flashing construction, or with reliance on caulking to prevent rain penetration and air leakage.

Other common problems included efflorescence, cracking, drafts, interior staining and corrosion.

Many of the problems reported appeared to be the result of poor or inadequate detailing for features such as flashing, cavity size or movement joints.

The study determined from the review of 47 sets of building plans that the vast majority did not provide enough details to guide the builder. Where the plans were detailed and comprehensive, the ONHWP files contained few or no problem complaints.

Inspections by designers seemed generally infrequent and probably ineffective as a means of quality control. The insufficient budgets of local building officials limit their focus to structural and fire safety only. In addition, since the plans are not complete, it is difficult, if not impossible, for inspectors to determine compliance. Another factor in the quality of construction is the contractor's abilities and attention to detail. Successful single-family home builders do not necessarily have the skills required for high-rise construction. It may be worth considering different warranty rates depending on the experience and track record of the contractor, or a third-party inspection system.

Recommendations

The computer program developed for this study could serve as the basis for acomprehensive data ifie on problems and design and construction details. Information could be provided by designers, ONHWP and CMHC, and the program could be refined to provide a finer breakdown of problems.

Other public andprivate building owners should be invited to provide problem data so that problems can be studied and minimized by improving original construction procedures.

The quality of building designs should be improved. Emphasis must be placed on practical education and on production of user-friendly technical information.

Bulletin 19, "Design and Site Review Reporting," should be implemented, with emphasison securing inspectors from qualified firms not directly responsible to either the contractor or the board. For instance, Technical Audits commissioned by Condominium Boards provided the most detailed identification of problems.

The National Building Code and the Ontario Building Code should contain requirements for the performance of the building envelope.

CMHC and ONHWP should develop information on remedial measures to correct common problems, along with schedules for normal maintenance and repair. CMHC is also moving to develop assessment strategies and repair/renovation strategies.

Existing information on effective ways to prevent rain penetration and moisture condensation is not being used. CMHC and ONHWP should continue to develop ways to get this information to the people who need it. CMHC is moving to develop "Best Practice" guides to deal with this, and developing seminars on detailing.

Project team:

Project Manager:

Jacques Rousseau

Research Report:

Construction Problems in Multi-Family Residential Buildings

Research Consultant:


Related Resources:

This publication in whole or part might be found online. Check the sources on the related article below. Or use search engines on the web.

Related Concepts


Author Information and Other Publications Notes
Drysdale, R. G.
Robert G. Drysdale
  1. Full scale tests of brick veneer steel stud walls - strength and rain penetration  



CRDBER, at CBS, BCEE, ENCS, Concordia,